directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New buffer backend
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:09:42 GMT
2013/7/17 Christoph Engelbert <noctarius@apache.org>

> Am 17.07.2013 10:51, schrieb Tommaso Teofili:
> > 2013/7/17 Christoph Engelbert <noctarius@apache.org>
> >
> >> Am 17.07.2013 09:23, schrieb Tommaso Teofili:
> >>> Hi Cristoph,
> >>>
> >>> I had a second look and it looks ok from my side, just did you ever try
> >> it
> >>> within an OSGi environment? I think it'd be worth making sure it works
> >>> there as we ship bundles.
> >> Hi Tommaso
> >>
> >> I use OSGi a lot and most of the code is already classloader aware
> >> (at least for all the internals) and since the buffer backend does
> >> not handle serialization and deserialization it should be not a big
> >> problem to make it eventually working in OSGi (I just had not a test
> >> yet). The buffer api is already build as a bundle and I just need to
> >> make minor adjustments - I think.
> >>
> > Ok, that's nice to hear, my doubt also comes from the fact that some jars
> > are not OSGi ready and would need some hack to make the whole thing work
> (I
> > am thinking especially to JNA).
> >
> > If you have time to make such tests than it'd be awesome, just to make
> sure
> > we don't affect the whole cache usability (as directmemory-cache depends
> on
> > the new backend).
>
> We can make the dependency optional since the complete old backend
> is still available and passes all the tests :-)


sure +1


> Hope to get some
> more time this weekend to finish some more things and a few OSGi
> integration tests - for me OSGi compatibility is one of the most
> important things. At least JNA should work in OSGi (not sure if this
> was a special packaging but I made it working someday way back).
>

ok great, given that, from my side you can go ahed committing it to trunk.

Regards,
Tommaso


>
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> >> Chris
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Tommaso
> >>>
> >>> 2013/7/15 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> regarding APIs I'm happy with suggested additions & improvements.
> >>>> And also the new buffer backend looks nice, I just didn't have time
to
> >>>> have a deeper look at the code but it feels great.
> >>>> I wonder if this could be used in an OSGi environment or such
> >> dependencies
> >>>> from local environment will make OSGi users less happy.
> >>>> I'll try to have a second look later this week but it looks quite
> good,
> >>>> thanks Christoph!
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Tommaso
> >>>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message