Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E9C21840E for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86010 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2015 13:30:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 85966 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2015 13:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@devicemap.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@devicemap.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 85955 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2015 13:30:39 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:30:39 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 238EB1A027C for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obre1 with SMTP id e1so98916375obr.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.35.42 with SMTP id e10mr16151845oej.26.1438608638404; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.81.15 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:30:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.0 reference client From: Reza Naghibi To: DeviceMap Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d04eedcf9bd051c682c12 --089e013d04eedcf9bd051c682c12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Werner, Just want to make sure we are on the same page regarding what was decided several months ago regarding me and you not engaging in each others works. I do not want 2.0 to be a repeat of the last 2 years of arguments, insanity, and FUD. What guarantees do I have that you will not cause the same disruption to 2.0? Do you have anything to say about what went on during the last 2 years? I personally have a lot to say which is why I think its best we stick to the agreement right now. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Werner Keil wrote: > Btw. as I am scheduled for 4 talks in total (including Tamaya co-speaking) > I'll also be at ApacheCon Europe during its Hackathon. Happy to offer > something there, too. e.g. new language support for DeviceMap or working on > some JIRA issues. > > Werner > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Werner Keil > wrote: > > > Looks like I may have some interesting stuff to tell or show at ApacheCon > > in Budapest:-) > > > > It's also still incubating, will be demonstrated at ACE, too by a fellow > > JSON-P EG Member, so at a later point, it might be worth giving Apache > > Johnzon a try for the JSON handling: > http://johnzon.incubator.apache.org/ > > > > I may look into some other languages like Groovy or Angular/NodeJS if > > nobody else does. > > Would be cool if Eberhard looked into .NET. I don't have the IDEs here at > > the moment (in a Java gig again) but between now and ApacheCon, if he's > too > > busy, I could also try C#, F# or VB.NET. > > After all I wrote serializers to both XML and JSON for my last > customer;-) > > > > I'll circulate a slide deck based on last year's Budapest template (if > > they even offer a new one it should be similar) with content as recent as > > Rome minus most of the WURFL images (the overview certainly tells it's > not > > open any more) and would appreciate if any of you could offer a few new > > slides regarding the 2.0 direction and efforts. > > > > Thanks, > > Werner > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Reza Naghibi wrote: > > > >> The 2.0 reference client has been written and passes all the initial > >> tests: > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/devicemap/trunk/clients/2.0/reference/ > >> > >> Its almost complete, just got to implement the attribute map and a few > >> more > >> transformers. Then im going to go ahead and beef up the reference > domains. > >> Then this step is done :) > >> > >> Im shooting to have this done before our next board report, which is due > >> in > >> about 2 weeks. > >> > >> After that, port over device data 1.0 to 2.0 and create the browser and > OS > >> 2.0 domains. > >> > >> If anyone here wanted to write clients in other languages, this is a > good > >> starting point. I will probably tackle the C client next. I can also > help > >> move the reference client over to the official Java client. > >> > >> Let me know if you have any questions. > >> > > > > > --089e013d04eedcf9bd051c682c12--