Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97DF218E2D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89320 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2015 08:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 89279 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2015 08:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@devicemap.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@devicemap.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 89267 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2015 08:40:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:40:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C27B9C0CE8 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:40:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.901 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSGkh68FBVLW for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 83E3A31C1C for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oio137 with SMTP id 137so81305002oio.0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:14:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=t3bC31XnbPP2s0dw9nyhqTrKRTBmGER7UsIqx4u9klo=; b=D83jOgF/Gu/WjPz+5VCS2YvjJrRX4Zwn2n5gQVD2tHLbtH9OR0v+W6q+drUkbY68G6 Zg6h/ZUBSRWdJH0lJLoreDy0geTj7VYZ2S3ir1SJobrf1q98aPDYISNBXchgp5YLkFJG exWxMiVq0lmvjJq5d84pOLeUrK6bEIC+GelkpKvwzOaIGHuuFoh3aznulo+3v9eTfNyN 08gmZ//lAiJ5D1xY2e82silfs7XluLCyMu+oXantyQRDLZcrn1xBTsuyYz8pgpTvjbrY q3L+arw+lTJ1Ey4nrkOCkBdgEcH7h8ZUZpGcWR8akl5CcLL4IJctFYICmbCVLhRPTDCF tiOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.191.84 with SMTP id p81mr17725968oif.131.1439194491910; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.239.11 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55C842DE.3040407@stefan-seelmann.de> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:14:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data 2.0 gone? From: Werner Keil To: dev@devicemap.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ddd8c740776051cf0947c --001a113ddd8c740776051cf0947c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 As there are at least 2 (both PMC members of other Apache projects and fellow speakers) attendees who registered for my DeviceMap talk http://sched.co/3x2Q if there is no strong opposition or someone who prefers to do it instead, I'm happy to hold it (I know there is hefty competition from Brooklyn and the Docker/Container community;-) As I see it, there is nothing wrong with a JSON format, but regardless of whether Reza now fancies "his" flavor elsewhere or not, I would prefer to discuss it with people who are working on JSON related projects like Johnzon more than I do myself and ask them for their input and advice. At least in Budapest (and Bertrand if you're able to attend you're of course more than welcome to participate, too) On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Werner Keil wrote: > I trust just like I undid changes or helped Radu when I tried to improve > the (somewhat odd) SVN structure of Browsermap some while ago, Reza or > others are able to roll-back changes he was not supposed to make. > A few days ago I also did a full sync of all relevant SVN content except > /contrib, so I would have a local backup copy, too. > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Werner Keil > wrote: > >> Is that Reza's idea of "forking"?;-O >> >> I won't comment it further, but it goes along what took place in the past >> about "deleting" and "destroying" stuff he or others contributed before. >> And while some earlier projects may be "archived" and found in a special >> location, nothing is destroyed or deleted in ways e.g. some WURFL >> contributors did 4 years ago... >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < >> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Stefan Seelmann >>> wrote: >>> > ...Why has data 2.0 been deleted?... >>> >>> I don't know why but it's these commits, from Reza: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/r1694312 >>> http://svn.apache.org/r1694311 >>> http://svn.apache.org/r1694310 >>> >>> Reza, can you explain what's going on? >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >> >> > --001a113ddd8c740776051cf0947c--