devicemap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Rename /clients/w3c-ddr to /clients/w3c?
Date Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:53:58 GMT
No problem, will work either way.

Let's see if anybody prefers a common folder or not.
Everything uses data, that is of course common to all clients, and while it
is possible one W3C client may make use of another, it is not sure yet.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Reza Naghibi <rezan@apache.org> wrote:

> -1
>
> This organization was debated, agreed upon, and executed months ago.
>
> The preferable route is what you stated, create a new client: w3c-ccpp
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Would anybody object if the /clients/w3c-ddr and /examples/w3c-ddr
> folders
> > are renamed to /clients/w3c and /examples/w3c?
> >
> > We could do a formal vote if that seems necessary, but after an initial
> > modularization and e.g. Reza's reply just earlier, it feels safe to
> assume
> > these 2 folders are of concern only to a few while a few others work in
> > different areas.
> >
> > As mentioned, work in the Apache Portals project and JSR 362 EG brought
> up
> > CC/PP support because this (W3C) standard is already supported by the
> > Portlet standard since 2.0.
> > Just like DDR it is another W3C standard, so while adding an extra
> > /clients/w3c-ccpp folder was possible, I would prefer putting W3C
> projects
> > under a folder common to all of them.
> >
> > As there are no Jenkins builds other than /data there should be no impact
> > on existing build scripts either.
> >
> > WDYT?
> > Werner
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message