devicemap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] svn layout
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:07:09 GMT
I renamed examples/ODDR to examples/w3c-ddr and the backup trunk is now
trunk_backup. When there is no more need for backup_trunk, we can delete it.


On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bertrand,
> Seems you missed the counterpart in
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/examples/,
> still contains an "ODDR" folder.
>
> Unless you get a chance to change, I'd be able to fix a bit later today.
> The top level folder looks like a pure "backup" so not concerned about it.
> I trust eventually someone can deal with that folder. If Jenkins also works
> again;-)
>
> Werner
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Agree, which is why the branch, though it allows commits, too might be
> > irrelevant now.
> >
> > Werner
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > ...One other thing seems to make little sense after Reza split many
> >> parts into
> >> > 1.0 / 2.0...
> >>
> >> Well, AFAIU the goal of this restructure is to get a nice split
> >> between the w3c-ddr stuff where you are supposed to work, and the rest
> >> where others who work on 2.0 can operate.
> >>
> >> So I think we can let them decide how to best use "their" space. svn
> >> branches wouldn't be convenient for that stuff anyway IMO.
> >>
> >> -Bertrand
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message