Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F015910236 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74705 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 14:49:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-devicemap-dev-archive@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 74650 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2015 14:49:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@devicemap.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@devicemap.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@devicemap.apache.org Received: (qmail 74552 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2015 14:49:17 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:49:17 +0000 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 2441B1A0041 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m14so9829758wev.28 for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr38038267wib.32.1420555755659; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.44.197 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <272295030.5244712.1420554769986.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10670.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRA tickets and setting From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@devicemap.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Werner Keil wrote: > ...the "deadline" (within the next 2h if I don't hear > from you) seemed a bit inappropriate... I haven't checked this particular case but in general as per [1] a 72-hour period is considered adequate in our projects, for lazy consensus as well as votes. Once again, with svn everything is undoable anyway, but I agree that "important" changes need prior discussion. -Bertrand [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html