Mailing-List: contact dev-help@devicemap.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@devicemap.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of werner.keil@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAGawe2LprNZtTtPL2W68dZLagxqhhpJaL=VvaCz9zWgFvUfTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <udiuox1kyetg5eoajdr8dkcg.1421568294981@email.android.com>
	<CAAGawe0jXPo7Ra2JCg+WPchm3ew21xPT2fK3X3rqsjN0KK_ZVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAGawe26A8Yubrqb=Nrd3FZzc+AaEyj=wW=ncZb+LZP-p+rwSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJnaRYQwxm0qNY9L31DarfCAy8Uz1pw65X3RKZCus0X+yw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAGawe0to9PnX4qN8+KSxYcDKkroPYGz0yZ4Epy2GQdgOEwp5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJmBtjP098vucsftjLyrpt4iR4DOkM48fc5K3RmCAzgmzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAGawe0K7h1ABFVAmps6R4eDnuooPq-Qqw+SOykVUE5tRVKbdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJm3g13X6hUFwXtAtW8vxuiLBTv8zDbzyZmp3ziYeSsD+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAGawe0xxY4woJZmgZ=1RAp6T10o45crv+qL0qg3paiJwK7Xzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJmZ9c33r9judLJGdazNpWa6L6i72t0vE=dxLiotfQ7T+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAGawe2LprNZtTtPL2W68dZLagxqhhpJaL=VvaCz9zWgFvUfTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:46:42 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAAGawe3B5dKnsutpJOj30+hoBz9QEPuGkZ7y7Rm_ZT0MCcq-9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to get the DDRSimpleAPI source code? (was: Does the build
 work?)
From: Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com>
To: dev@devicemap.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dee6053d3f6050d1b8976

--001a113dee6053d3f6050d1b8976
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

W3C also has a Github community, but older standards like DDR are not
mirrored there any more.
Almost never do these have a LICENCE file, where it does, it is a pointer:
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/LICENSE


So I suggest to amend the NOTICE, will send a separate thread to vote on it,

Werner

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> I'll think of an amended NOTICE file, though I feel we won't need a giant
> amount of explaining there.
> Look at one of W3C's most prestigious outputs (just up to date a few
> months ago)
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
>
> or more importantly the latest DOM (as of 2008 pretty much at the same
> time as DDR Simple)
> http://www.w3.org/TR/ElementTraversal/
> they all look exactly the same. And DOM Element Traversal contains a Java
> Binding just like DDR Simple which is part of the JDK. No "Software
> License" mentioned there either, that seems to have been practiced only in
> earlier specs prior to 2005.
>
> See http://www.w3.org/TR for a list of all W3C Recommendations.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > ...Does "I don't care" mean, you would not vote or vote "N" on it, is
>> your
>> > vote here based on the notice text being sufficient from Apache's legal
>> > understanding?...
>>
>> Any PMC vote needs three +1s to be valid.
>>
>> I will gladly cast my +1 if you suggest a notice text that makes it
>> possible for DeviceMap to release code that depends on the W3C APIs.
>>
>> By "I don't care" I mean I'm not interested in using those APIs, but
>> I'm not opposed to someone else implementing else for DeviceMap to
>> release.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
>

--001a113dee6053d3f6050d1b8976--