Mailing-List: contact dev-help@devicemap.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@devicemap.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rezmang@yahoo.com designates
 98.139.212.165 as permitted sender)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:47:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Reza Naghibi <reza.naghibi@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Reply-To: Reza Naghibi <reza.naghibi@yahoo.com>
To: Devicemap-dev <dev@devicemap.apache.org>
Message-ID: 
 <1872935539.1173741.1420843630381.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10661.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Subject: Draft of 2.0 pattern spec
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_1173740_939736738.1420843630376"

------=_Part_1173740_939736738.1420843630376
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here is a draft:

http://wiki.apache.org/devicemap/Patterns2


So this is what I envision as the meat of 2.0. Think of it as high level id=
eas. Nothing written in stone, just brainstorming.

Note how there is no mention of devices, browsers, or os. This is done on p=
urpose. The classifiers simply implement this spec. They can focus on speed=
, efficiency, correctness. The data then uses the spec to classify. Data sh=
ouldn't have to worry about how it gets implemented and on what platform or=
 language. So this spec allows for a really fast classification implementat=
ion and very concise and expressive data domains. So both sides should be s=
erved well. I hope :)

So thats really it. Please let me know your thoughts. Im going to dive back=
 into trawling JIRA for new devices and start getting the 1.0.2 data releas=
e ready. =C2=A0


------=_Part_1173740_939736738.1420843630376--