devicemap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Werner Keil <>
Subject Re: Suggested NOTICE addendum for modules that use the W3C DDR APIs
Date Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:00:28 GMT
Is the slightly tweaked sentence (I tried to make them aware of possibly
having to talk about lawyers and slightly soften the "fear factor" of
calling it "safe to use the code") OK for a new ballot?

Where some of us (e.g. via JCP EC) are in touch with W3C we might try to
reach out, but the last archive entries in their mailing list ("if you
continue to spam us we'll call the cops", check it out if you want;-D) did
not sound too promising towards trying to contact them there or directly...

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Werner Keil <>
> wrote:
> > ...There is a formal IP clearance section at ASF where Sling was one of
> the
> > latest cases:
> > ...
> Yeah if someone who owns the W3C DDR code wants to contribute it that
> would be the way.
> > ...Until then I guess that sentence will help users especially
> > in large companies to ask their legal team for advice if needed;-)...
> Of course, I agree that many users won't care about all that - it's
> just that we have to be clean w.r.t not putting any more limitations
> than what the Apache License requires.
> -Bertrand

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message