deltaspike-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Data module and serializability in cluster w/ distributable session
Date Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:23:16 GMT
:D

IMO it also doesn't make sense to serialize repositories!

2014-12-16 14:16 GMT+01:00 Thomas Hug <thomas.hug@gmail.com>:
>
> Officially declaring this the "Thomas" thread ;-)
>
> Agree with Thomas that going for AppScope is probably the simplest
> workaround for now. I remember some efforts for serialization (as OWB
> complained for some cases) but overall it does not work well when you have
> to inject EMs or use Instance<>. Fixing this properly might require a major
> refactoring.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i would make your repositories AppScoped.
> > Unfortunately AppScoped doesn't work for abstract repositories :/ I still
> > have the same problem ->
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-647
> >
> >
> > 2014-12-15 23:47 GMT+01:00 Thomas Fr├╝hbeck <fruehbeck@aon.at>:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we are integrating Data module of DS as vital part of our persistence
> > > layer, but unfortunately Repositories are not Serializable, so that
> SFSB
> > or
> > > SessionScoped beans with Dependent scoped dependencies on Repositories
> > will
> > > fail in cluster configurations.
> > >
> > > Due to some recent overuse of scoped dependencies we would like to
> > refrain
> > > from again starting to scope vital infrastructure.
> > >
> > > Can you give some advice, which way to solve this problem?
> > >
> > > Many thanks for your dedication to DeltaSpike and your help,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message