Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOqetn_Hof=DE2PU+J4u+zG3_8=cJA48Gn0LQ6bVPa8eqAVQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGJtJfHiT_ZZJ_UrQOOB13HfOZnMd-P+WVYM-qRLyF97f16=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1364747720.48119.YahooMailNeo@web28905.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
	<CAN+FrnXup8XZHj5Coiytg8aPV-hufPbRZ1gGEy8PwnboJBtnzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEXeC6wYap3s5L__z=YBMmzwimB3yzjoQGp4+KWrg2fr7sLZ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<B9768B18-0A81-40C0-A033-935353D0ECE8@redhat.com>
	<CAN+FrnVF965H+w74b+aBjEfPeFLPuSuFztbf94J8x+AUdDymew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACLE=7OQ41-uNxfD-oiB8e-EV7s91x1OenWkvX7XF22eqGgf6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGJtJfFYGjtTX7dWPwDiA-KVOcXtTf1jSZ1+wO6AxYxM9jDcYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOqetn_Hof=DE2PU+J4u+zG3_8=cJA48Gn0LQ6bVPa8eqAVQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:56:21 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CACLE=7P1yZZnRc4=1KgYHgQPjeTwQm3y-9Ei-z8-MQ87Xs5o+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343394180cff04d9654b16

--047d7b343394180cff04d9654b16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1 after first tlp release to be exact
Le 2 avr. 2013 20:38, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com> a =E9crit :

> Once DS is a TLP, we should try avoiding breaking integrations.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > that can happen until v1 (and not until deltaspike is a tlp).
> > (it was one of our first agreements.)
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/4/2 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Think people know ds is not yet a tlp so some instability is fine IMH=
O
> > > Le 2 avr. 2013 20:00, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum@gmail.com> a =E9crit :
> > >
> > > > One small problem is the early integration of DS into JBoss Tools -
> > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13901
> > > >
> > > > I don't know how many people if any are using that integration yet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 to drop, I hate them.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1 Apr 2013, at 10:06, Christian Kaltepoth <
> christian@kaltepoth.de
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for dropping
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/3/31 Cody Lerum <cody.lerum@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> drop em.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <
> > struberg@yahoo.de>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowaday=
s.
> > So
> > > > this
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >>> just superfluous.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> LieGrue,
> > > > > >>> strub
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >>>> From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >>>> Cc:
> > > > > >>>> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
> > > > > >>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> hi @ all,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation=
"
> > for
> > > > all
> > > > > >>>> our
> > > > > >>>> annotations within a package.
> > > > > >>>> however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just
> > > > contains
> > > > > >>>> annotations.
> > > > > >>>> e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains th=
e
> > > > package
> > > > > >>>> "annotation".
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the
> > "annotation"
> > > > > >>>> package
> > > > > >>>> and some don't)
> > > > > >>>> -> we have to align it the one way or the other.
> > > > > >>>> i'm currently in favour of dropping the
> "annotation"-package/s.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> regards,
> > > > > >>>> gerhard
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Kaltepoth
> > > > > > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
> > > > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
> > > > > > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--047d7b343394180cff04d9654b16--