deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Bryzak <sbry...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
Date Sun, 07 Apr 2013 10:12:56 GMT
+1

On 01/04/13 02:35, Mark Struberg wrote:
> yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is just superfluous.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
>>
>> hi @ all,
>>
>> we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all
>> our
>> annotations within a package.
>> however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
>> annotations.
>> e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package
>> "annotation".
>>
>> currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation"
>> package
>> and some don't)
>> -> we have to align it the one way or the other.
>> i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s.
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>


Mime
View raw message