Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cody.lerum@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1364747720.48119.YahooMailNeo@web28905.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
References: 
 <CAGJtJfHiT_ZZJ_UrQOOB13HfOZnMd-P+WVYM-qRLyF97f16=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1364747720.48119.YahooMailNeo@web28905.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 11:57:16 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAN+FrnXup8XZHj5Coiytg8aPV-hufPbRZ1gGEy8PwnboJBtnzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
From: Cody Lerum <cody.lerum@gmail.com>
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbcc818296704d93c3c47

--047d7bacbcc818296704d93c3c47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

drop em.


On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is
> just superfluous.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
> >
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all
> > our
> > annotations within a package.
> > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
> > annotations.
> > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package
> > "annotation".
> >
> > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation"
> > package
> > and some don't)
> > -> we have to align it the one way or the other.
> > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
>

--047d7bacbcc818296704d93c3c47--