deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
Date Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:57:16 GMT
drop em.


On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is
> just superfluous.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
> >
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all
> > our
> > annotations within a package.
> > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
> > annotations.
> > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package
> > "annotation".
> >
> > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation"
> > package
> > and some don't)
> > -> we have to align it the one way or the other.
> > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message