deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release
Date Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:28:54 GMT
@ romain:
imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later on again),
if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately).
anybody is welcome to work on DS-333.

@ DS-288
it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once DS-289 is
done.
(yes we need it for 0.4)

@ xml-config
afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it.

regards,
gerhard



2013/3/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>

> I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for now makes sense,
> we can enrich this further in another release.  How about we close 113 as a
> reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items?  I see you already
> did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a case as well.
>
> Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in 0.4 or can it
> wait?
>
> Romain, I didn't quite get you.  Are you saying you're on hold on this one
> (dependent on something?).
>
> Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269 to 272).  I'd
> prefer to move it.
>
> For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's needed for
> older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix?
>
> Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these?  There are other
> catch like issues out there.  Are they needed?
>
> Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/
>
> BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1]
>
> John
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it
> >
> > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and keep
> > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm part right
> > now it can work but then the question will be which shade version? a
> proxy
> > as in cxf?....)
> >
> > other are not blocker IMO
> >
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >
> > > hi john,
> > >
> > > @ examples:
> > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here
> > >
> > > @ DS-60
> > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4)
> > >
> > > @ DS-113
> > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module
> > > (i'll create the module today)
> > >
> > > @ DS-263
> > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1
> > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to know what
> you
> > > need)
> > >
> > > @ DS-278
> > > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo.
> > > however, it isn't a real blocker
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started
> to
> > > move
> > > > towards a 0.4 release.  I created the filter at [1] to show our
> current
> > > > progress.
> > > >
> > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the
> > > > release.  Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that we've
> > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization (note:
> I'll
> > > use
> > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is TL;DR)
> > > >
> > > > DS-306 - I see examples.  Do we need more?
> > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query.  Should this
> > > have
> > > > spawned child tasks?
> > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently it works
> > just
> > > > like the Seam3 version.  Can this be closed?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Some low hanging fruit:
> > > >
> > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as well.
>  I've
> > > been
> > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary release
> > would
> > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module.  If this isn't complete, do we need it
> > in
> > > > 0.4?
> > > >
> > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add.
> > > >
> > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too difficult
> in
> > > > either CODI or Seam3.
> > > >
> > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 but is a
> > > blocker
> > > > for the release.  I'll update it as such.
> > > >
> > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be (e.g. it's
> > not
> > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled.  Since previously only
> > 289
> > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at everything else.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message