deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Pending items for release
Date Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:57:18 GMT
hi john,

yes - cody understood it perfectly right (also see my 2nd message which i
sent at almost the same time).

regards,
gerhard



2013/3/23 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>

> Gerhard,
>
> Do you agree w/ Cody's synopsis?  I think mimic is what you're trying to
> describe, but threw me off when you said aligned; I assumed you meant be
> dependent on.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi john,
> >
> > no - we will just create our own interface like ClientWindow and provide
> a
> > default implementation.
> > (for jsf 2.2+ we just provide an own module with an adapter which
> delegates
> > to javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindow.)
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> >
> > > I'm not sure I follow.  We're dependent on JEE7 releases to release DS
> > 0.4?
> > > I hope we're not really thinking this...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> > > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > hi john,
> > > >
> > > > no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new
> ClientWindow
> > > api
> > > > (of jsf 2.2).
> > > > afterwards i finish my tickets (which need it) and then we are ready
> > for
> > > a
> > > > release.
> > > > imo the rest is nice to have for v0.4
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > gerhard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Gerhard,
> > > > >
> > > > > But currently it's assigned to Mark. So to outsiders, who maybe
> > haven't
> > > > > been playing close court, someone's already handling it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since CODI has a Window Scope, I'm assuming that it's simply a port
> > > from
> > > > > CODI to DS.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> > > > > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hi john,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] is the most blocking one we need for v0.4.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > gerhard
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/3/22 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I see is
under
> > [1] ;
> > > > > > looking
> > > > > > > at this list it's not clear which are ready to be done
or which
> > > need
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > info.  In addition when I look at [2] we end up with 50
open
> > > issues.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > V 0.3 was released in August 2012.  I'd like to help get
DS to
> a
> > > 0.4
> > > > > > > release.  So please help clarify what issues are in need
of
> help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DELTASPIKE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message