deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release
Date Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:03:10 GMT
I doubt it. I've responded (I believe) to all of them and the original
reporters have not given feedback either way. I interpret that as

* Thanks, that works, or
* I no longer care

People can always open more tickets if they feel it's still an issue and we
can dig further.


On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:40 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>wrote:

> Ok.  How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed
> for 0.4?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I
> figured
> > it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly add it
> in
> > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it.
> > —
> > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jason,
> > > Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to DeltaSpike, even
> > > though it was already voted in?
> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via osgi blueprint,
> > >> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam config
> > stuff,
> > >> we can certainly do that too.
> > >> —
> > >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not straight
> > forward
> > >> > since some people will not want to bring any additional lib for it
> > >> (because
> > >> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). Wonder if
> > handling
> > >> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too.
> > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > >> >> @ romain:
> > >> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something (and add it later
on
> > >> again),
> > >> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it immediately).
> > >> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @ DS-288
> > >> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier i'll finish it once
> > DS-289
> > >> is
> > >> >> done.
> > >> >> (yes we need it for 0.4)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @ xml-config
> > >> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked on it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> regards,
> > >> >> gerhard
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface only for
now
> makes
> > >> sense,
> > >> >> > we can enrich this further in another release.  How about
we
> close
> > 113
> > >> >> as a
> > >> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for remaining items? 
I see
> you
> > >> >> already
> > >> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract classes as a
case as
> > >> well.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we need this in
0.4 or
> > can it
> > >> >> > wait?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you.  Are you saying you're on
hold on
> > this
> > >> >> one
> > >> >> > (dependent on something?).
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 0.4? (DS-269
to
> > 272).
> > >>  I'd
> > >> >> > prefer to move it.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep it since it's
> needed
> > >> for
> > >> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will not fix?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we need these? 
There
> are
> > >> other
> > >> >> > catch like issues out there.  Are they needed?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues [1]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > John
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> >> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > Hi
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release
and
> > keep
> > >> >> > > interface handling for this iteration (well if you import
asm
> > part
> > >> >> right
> > >> >> > > now it can work but then the question will be which
shade
> > version? a
> > >> >> > proxy
> > >> >> > > as in cxf?....)
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > other are not blocker IMO
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >> >> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >> >> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > hi john,
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > @ examples:
> > >> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our goal is here
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > @ DS-60
> > >> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short<
after
> 0.4)
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > @ DS-113
> > >> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to
an own module
> > >> >> > > > (i'll create the module today)
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > @ DS-263
> > >> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1
> > >> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi
for it to
> > know
> > >> what
> > >> >> > you
> > >> >> > > > need)
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > @ DS-278
> > >> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find a better
approach imo.
> > >> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > regards,
> > >> >> > > > gerhard
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > > All,
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to
help get things
> > >> started
> > >> >> > to
> > >> >> > > > move
> > >> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release.  I created the filter
at [1] to show
> > our
> > >> >> > current
> > >> >> > > > > progress.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4,
with 27
> unresolved
> > for
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> > > > > release.  Some of these issues stick out,
with me thinking
> > that
> > >> >> we've
> > >> >> > > > > actually completed them but perhaps need some
finalization
> > >> (note:
> > >> >> > I'll
> > >> >> > > > use
> > >> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key
in JIRA which is
> > >> TL;DR)
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples.  Do we need more?
> > >> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating
CDI Query.
> >  Should
> > >> >> this
> > >> >> > > > have
> > >> >> > > > > spawned child tasks?
> > >> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one
and apparently
> > it
> > >> >> works
> > >> >> > > just
> > >> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version.  Can this be closed?
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit:
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something
like this as
> > well.
> > >> >> >  I've
> > >> >> > > > been
> > >> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think
having a binary
> > >> release
> > >> >> > > would
> > >> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module.  If this isn't
complete, do
> we
> > >> need
> > >> >> it
> > >> >> > > in
> > >> >> > > > > 0.4?
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to
add.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature,
but wasn't too
> > >> >> difficult
> > >> >> > in
> > >> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled
for 0.4
> > but
> > >> is a
> > >> >> > > > blocker
> > >> >> > > > > for the release.  I'll update it as such.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > If you have something in the list below that
shouldn't be
> > (e.g.
> > >> >> it's
> > >> >> > > not
> > >> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled.
 Since
> > previously
> > >> >> only
> > >> >> > > 289
> > >> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking
at
> > everything
> > >> >> else.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > John
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > [1]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>



-- 
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message