deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:13:39 GMT
+1

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
> To: "deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org" <deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Heading towards a 0.4 release
> 
> I doubt it. I've responded (I believe) to all of them and the original
> reporters have not given feedback either way. I interpret that as
> 
> * Thanks, that works, or
> * I no longer care
> 
> People can always open more tickets if they feel it's still an issue and we
> can dig further.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:40 AM, John D. Ament 
> <john.d.ament@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>>  Ok.  How about the open catch issues? Do you feel any of those are needed
>>  for 0.4?
>> 
>> 
>>  On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com
>>  >wrote:
>> 
>>  > The last time I asked about it the responses seemed lukewarm, so I
>>  figured
>>  > it wasn't something people really cared about. We could certainly 
> add it
>>  in
>>  > post 0.4 if there really is a desire for it.
>>  > —
>>  > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
>>  >
>>  > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, John D. Ament 
> <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
>>  > wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > Jason,
>>  > > Does that mean we are no longer bringing XML config to 
> DeltaSpike, even
>>  > > though it was already voted in?
>>  > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jason Porter 
> <lightguard.jp@gmail.com
>>  > >wrote:
>>  > >> Wrt xml-config, I'll be working on configuring cdi via 
> osgi blueprint,
>>  > >> over in the Aries project. If we want to port over the seam 
> config
>>  > stuff,
>>  > >> we can certainly do that too.
>>  > >> —
>>  > >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
>>  > >>
>>  > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>  > >> >
>>  > >> wrote:
>>  > >>
>>  > >> > @Gerhard: the point about proxy was i thought it was not 
> straight
>>  > forward
>>  > >> > since some people will not want to bring any additional 
> lib for it
>>  > >> (because
>>  > >> > they use only interfaces and proxy libs can conflcts). 
> Wonder if
>>  > handling
>>  > >> > it with a dep optional couldn't do the trick too.
>>  > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>  > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau 
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>  > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>  > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>  > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>  > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>  > >> > 2013/3/26 Gerhard Petracek 
> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>>  > >> >> @ romain:
>>  > >> >> imo it doesn't make sense to remove something 
> (and add it later on
>>  > >> again),
>>  > >> >> if it's just a matter of few hours (to do it 
> immediately).
>>  > >> >> anybody is welcome to work on DS-333.
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >> @ DS-288
>>  > >> >> it's almost done and as i mentioned earlier 
> i'll finish it once
>>  > DS-289
>>  > >> is
>>  > >> >> done.
>>  > >> >> (yes we need it for 0.4)
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >> @ xml-config
>>  > >> >> afair we had an agreement already, but nobody worked 
> on it.
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >> regards,
>>  > >> >> gerhard
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >> 2013/3/26 John D. Ament 
> <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >> >> > I think leaving proxy support to full interface 
> only for now
>>  makes
>>  > >> sense,
>>  > >> >> > we can enrich this further in another release.  
> How about we
>>  close
>>  > 113
>>  > >> >> as a
>>  > >> >> > reduced scope and open a new issue for 
> remaining items?  I see
>>  you
>>  > >> >> already
>>  > >> >> > did some Gerhard, but we still have abstract 
> classes as a case as
>>  > >> well.
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > Gerhard, can you also comment on 288? Do we 
> need this in 0.4 or
>>  > can it
>>  > >> >> > wait?
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > Romain, I didn't quite get you.  Are you 
> saying you're on hold on
>>  > this
>>  > >> >> one
>>  > >> >> > (dependent on something?).
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > Does anyone believe we need Seam XML Config in 
> 0.4? (DS-269 to
>>  > 272).
>>  > >>  I'd
>>  > >> >> > prefer to move it.
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > For DS-105, it looks like consensus is to keep 
> it since it's
>>  needed
>>  > >> for
>>  > >> >> > older Weld versions. If so can we close as will 
> not fix?
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > Jason P - Can you look at DS-132/134? Do we 
> need these?  There
>>  are
>>  > >> other
>>  > >> >> > catch like issues out there.  Are they needed?
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > Mark S - You have 12 issues assigned to you :/
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > BTW I created a new filter - only open issues 
> [1]
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > John
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > [1] 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323789
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Romain 
> Manni-Bucau
>>  > >> >> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >> > > Hi
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > DS-113: think we can push partial bean to 
> another release and
>>  > keep
>>  > >> >> > > interface handling for this iteration 
> (well if you import asm
>>  > part
>>  > >> >> right
>>  > >> >> > > now it can work but then the question will 
> be which shade
>>  > version? a
>>  > >> >> > proxy
>>  > >> >> > > as in cxf?....)
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > other are not blocker IMO
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>  > >> >> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau 
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>  > >> >> > > *Blog: 
> **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>  > >> >> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>  > >> >> > > *LinkedIn: 
> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>  > >> >> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek 
> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> > > > hi john,
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > @ examples:
>>  > >> >> > > > we haven't discussed what our 
> goal is here
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > @ DS-60
>>  > >> >> > > > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and 
> release 0.5 >short< after
>>  0.4)
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > @ DS-113
>>  > >> >> > > > we have to change the proxy-lib and 
> move it to an own module
>>  > >> >> > > > (i'll create the module today)
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > @ DS-263
>>  > >> >> > > > not needed, but nice to have -> +1
>>  > >> >> > > > (you can have a look at the setup we 
> used in codi for it to
>>  > know
>>  > >> what
>>  > >> >> > you
>>  > >> >> > > > need)
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > @ DS-278
>>  > >> >> > > > i re-opened it because we should find 
> a better approach imo.
>>  > >> >> > > > however, it isn't a real blocker
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > regards,
>>  > >> >> > > > gerhard
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament 
> <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > All,
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, 
> I wanted to help get things
>>  > >> started
>>  > >> >> > to
>>  > >> >> > > > move
>>  > >> >> > > > > towards a 0.4 release.  I 
> created the filter at [1] to show
>>  > our
>>  > >> >> > current
>>  > >> >> > > > > progress.
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > We currently have 50 issues 
> fixed in 0.4, with 27
>>  unresolved
>>  > for
>>  > >> >> the
>>  > >> >> > > > > release.  Some of these issues 
> stick out, with me thinking
>>  > that
>>  > >> >> we've
>>  > >> >> > > > > actually completed them but 
> perhaps need some finalization
>>  > >> (note:
>>  > >> >> > I'll
>>  > >> >> > > > use
>>  > >> >> > > > > the abbreviation DS for the 
> DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is
>>  > >> TL;DR)
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-306 - I see examples.  Do we 
> need more?
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-60 - I believe we have 
> started integrating CDI Query.
>>  >  Should
>>  > >> >> this
>>  > >> >> > > > have
>>  > >> >> > > > > spawned child tasks?
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns 
> on this one and apparently
>>  > it
>>  > >> >> works
>>  > >> >> > > just
>>  > >> >> > > > > like the Seam3 version.  Can 
> this be closed?
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > Some low hanging fruit:
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking 
> for something like this as
>>  > well.
>>  > >> >> >  I've
>>  > >> >> > > > been
>>  > >> >> > > > > playing with JBoss modules a lot 
> and think having a binary
>>  > >> release
>>  > >> >> > > would
>>  > >> >> > > > > help add DS as a JBoss Module.  
> If this isn't complete, do
>>  we
>>  > >> need
>>  > >> >> it
>>  > >> >> > > in
>>  > >> >> > > > > 0.4?
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy 
> enough to add.
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another 
> needed feature, but wasn't too
>>  > >> >> difficult
>>  > >> >> > in
>>  > >> >> > > > > either CODI or Seam3.
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one 
> isn't even scheduled for 0.4
>>  > but
>>  > >> is a
>>  > >> >> > > > blocker
>>  > >> >> > > > > for the release.  I'll 
> update it as such.
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > If you have something in the 
> list below that shouldn't be
>>  > (e.g.
>>  > >> >> it's
>>  > >> >> > > not
>>  > >> >> > > > > needed for 0.4) we should get it 
> rescheduled.  Since
>>  > previously
>>  > >> >> only
>>  > >> >> > > 289
>>  > >> >> > > > > was declared needed for 0.4 we 
> should be looking at
>>  > everything
>>  > >> >> else.
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > John
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > > > [1]:
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788
>>  > >> >> > > > >
>>  > >> >> > > >
>>  > >> >> > >
>>  > >> >> >
>>  > >> >>
>>  > >>
>>  >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jason Porter
> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
> 

Mime
View raw message