Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36F11DFD3 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97969 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 13:53:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97841 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 13:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97812 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2012 13:53:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:53:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of john.d.ament@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-da0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:53:17 +0000 Received: by mail-da0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s35so2452385dak.6 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:52:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=k3nhFtTmJvlKkAw3gDfHU2S8wbxBdwnLlaslv+ENxRk=; b=ocNizMh9ZJN0Nifhsg3c/rxMLI0DipqsreEUX1X96GaFq1Usu/S7Ua4var6GgE6lvd ktAKH0vPED3Sz6x5lH6tBQpnsqxmkmKLquAvGTslIEc2wj3rQgM3KIHT5v3e05iNgFuP leJwhPRaPyApASJJMjFSTlOC4lqGtLO75boNhUE+snwnvHkrKs1r9oYZLYtLIdTXPjLp ZFtFzk7coZFHvh2R22kcVgTrceDaYwuaBU+nvQbud7l1w0n2DuXlR6HdyYq2ZdLKyh8j WhoMBd5XlYArPKj9uEvwhPiTJsRRfZruy+FjXcDIFR+2SkT65LF5qh6wuHZt94Tx3z20 Xo1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.76.37 with SMTP id h5mr31936621paw.33.1355752369111; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:52:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.2.105 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:52:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5E0AA982-B6CC-4210-8BF8-130B5293FB7E@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:52:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap From: "John D. Ament" To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042f94105d40dc04d10cb273 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d042f94105d40dc04d10cb273 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Almost like a cross community interaction, similar to the way DS started? On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 for a separated lib but not in DS IMO > > could be a commons-bval or something like that no? depend the amount > of validations > > that's said bval-extra works too and i think i saw the same in > hibernate (can't remember the name) > > maybe just another "merge" project to create, wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek : > > +0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator is a > > constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.) > > > > @ thomas: > > besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1]. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] > > > http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional > > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> yep: here the extra part: > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific > >> IIRC) > >> > >> and here the email: > >> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > >> > >> > >> 2012/12/17 John D. Ament : > >> > +1 to Romain's thoughts. > >> > > >> > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since > >> > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application > stack. > >> > Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps it > would > >> > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints in > an > >> > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're just > part of > >> > the JAR). > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we shouldnt > take > >> >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for that) - i > >> >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra > >> >> > >> >> wdyt? > >> >> > >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko : > >> >> > ng i used in some project is > >> >> > >> > --f46d042f94105d40dc04d10cb273--