deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-113] Review and Discuss ServiceHandler
Date Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:56:07 GMT
hi john,

that can't be - the described example (/excerpt) is a copy of a working
example (tested with owb and weld).

the only use-case (we have so far) which can't be implemented with std. cdi
mechanisms (due to abstract classes) is DELTASPIKE-60.

@ InvocationHandler as a separated bean (at runtime):
currently i can't see a benefit for DELTASPIKE-60.

regards,
gerhard



2012/12/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>

> but the
> specific one annotated a certain way.  The cleanest way (conceptual
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message