deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:19:27 GMT
hi karl,

it's implemented via a producer - see [1].
but you don't really need cdi for it - see e.g. [2].

regards,
gerhard

[1] http://s.apache.org/ury
[2]
http://os890.blogspot.co.at/2010/06/multi-field-form-validation-with-jsr.html



2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>

> As far as i understand, validateAll just validates all components but you
> can't use custom logic.
>
> Checkout the seam docu here:
>
> http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/faces/latest/reference/en-US/html/components.html
>
> 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén <karl.kilden@gmail.com>
>
> > Hrmm still not sure I understand. First off didn't Pete just say it was
> > just a JSF-validator? It also sounds and reads just like validateAll from
> > omnifaces?
> >
> > What is lacking that you would like to see solved by CDI? And is it a
> > natural fit for CDI extensions rather then BV / JSF extensions?
> >
> > Best regards / Karl
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > they are nice but i can't see a replacement for s:validateForm.
> > > IMO s:validateForm is really a simple solution for cross-field
> > validation,
> > > which is CDI based.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > THomas
> > >
> > > 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén <karl.kilden@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Well these are the validators from omnifaces as per my previous
> > > > recommendation:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >    - RequiredCheckboxValidator<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/RequiredCheckboxValidator.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateAll<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateAll.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateAllOrNone<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateAllOrNone.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateEqual<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateEqual.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateOne<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOne.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateOneOrMore<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOneOrMore.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateOneOrNone<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOneOrNone.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateOrder<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateOrder.xhtml
> > > > >
> > > >    - validateUnique
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >    <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://showcase-omnifaces.rhcloud.com/showcase/validators/validateUnique.xhtml
> > > > >Best
> > > >    regards / Karl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > PrimeFaces doesn't have such a component/utility.
> > > > > Also AFAICS it's based on CDI, so IMO DeltaSpike is a good place
> for
> > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/12/17 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 17 Dec 2012, at 08:55, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > hi karl,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1 apache myfaces (extval) doesn't implement jsr 303
(e.g.
> > apache
> > > > > > > > bval implements it)
> > > > > > > > #2 there is no agreement that ds is only backend oriented
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > > > gerhard
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Karl Kildén <karl.kilden@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Thomas, fellow user here.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> BV is as you may know specified in JSR-303. It
has great
> > > > > > > implementations by
> > > > > > > >> myfaces and hibernate that you can find easily.
Thus this
> will
> > > not
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> implemented in deltaspike afaik. However providing
some
> common
> > > > > > > constraints
> > > > > > > >> beyond the specification sounds like a good idea.
Note that
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > mean
> > > > > > > >> while @Email is almost trivial to implement yourself
if you
> > > search
> > > > > it
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >> little. JSR-303 is highly extensible just like
CDI. The
> > > > > implementation
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > >> choose might have it as an extra already.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> For frontend extras I can't say I see an obvious
home in
> > > > deltaspike
> > > > > > > >> (someone correct me if I am wrong about this).
But I think
> for
> > > now
> > > > > > > >> Deltaspike is more backend oriented. I recommend
having a
> look
> > > at
> > > > > > > omnifaces
> > > > > > > >> that already provide several great custom jsf-validators
and
> > has
> > > > an
> > > > > > open
> > > > > > > >> request for users to ask for additional ones.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> best regards / Karl
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2012/12/16 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> is there a roadmap available for all upcoming
features?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Will there also be a BV module in the future?
Will it also
> > > > include
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > >>> commons constraints like Email?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hmm, I think this could be a good thing for a parallel
project
> to
> > > > > > > DeltaSpike actually - a library of BV constraints not branded
> by
> > a
> > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > impl. I've cc'd Emmanuel, spec lead for BV, to see if he
has
> any
> > > > plans
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > such a thing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> What about the Seam s:validateForm? IMO it's
a simple way
> for
> > > > cross
> > > > > > > field
> > > > > > > >>> validation. Will this be added in future releases?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is not actually a BV validator, but a JSF validator.
I
> know
> > > Mark
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > working on JSF stuff for DeltaSpike atm, perhaps this is
> > something
> > > > > Jason
> > > > > > > could add to that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this something that belongs in DeltaSpike, or should it be
in
> a
> > > JSF
> > > > > > component library? I know RichFaces has something very similar,
I
> > > > believe
> > > > > > PrimeFaces does as well (haven't looked for a while) and I have
> no
> > > idea
> > > > > > about other component libraries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> How can i contribue to DeltaSpike? I could
do some smaller
> > > tasks
> > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > >>> problems.
> > > > > > > >>> I also implemented constraints like
> > EqualsExpression("#{...}").
> > > > > Maybe
> > > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > > >>> could be useful for other users, too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This page should help -
> > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/deltaspike/community.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Best regards,
> > > > > > > >>> Thomas
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jason Porter
> > > > > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Software Engineer
> > > > > > Open Source Advocate
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> > > > > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message