deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:18:34 GMT
+1


2012/12/17 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> back then while discussing this in BVal we also had the idea to just add a
> module to commons-validator. This project already has tons of validations.
> We might easily add bean-validation contraint annotations for those.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap
> >
> > +1 for a separated lib but not in DS IMO
> >
> > could be a commons-bval or something like that no? depend the amount
> > of validations
> >
> > that's said bval-extra works too and i think i saw the same in
> > hibernate (can't remember the name)
> >
> > maybe just another "merge" project to create, wdyt?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>:
> >>  +0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator
> is a
> >>  constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.)
> >>
> >>  @ thomas:
> >>  besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1].
> >>
> >>  regards,
> >>  gerhard
> >>
> >>  [1]
> >>
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>>  yep: here the extra part:
> >>>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific
> >>>  IIRC)
> >>>
> >>>  and here the email:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java
> >>>
> >>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>  Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>  Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>  LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>  Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  2012/12/17 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>:
> >>>  > +1 to Romain's thoughts.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since
> >>>  > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application
> > stack.
> >>>  >  Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps
> > it would
> >>>  > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints
> > in an
> >>>  > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're
> > just part of
> >>>  > the JAR).
> >>>  >
> >>>  >
> >>>  > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>  > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>  >
> >>>  >> Hi,
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we
> > shouldnt take
> >>>  >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for
> > that) - i
> >>>  >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> wdyt?
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>  >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>  >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>  >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>  >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko
> > <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
> >>>  >> > ng i used in some project is
> >>>  >>
> >>>
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message