deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DeltaSpike Roadmap
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:47:43 GMT
+1 for a separated lib but not in DS IMO

could be a commons-bval or something like that no? depend the amount
of validations

that's said bval-extra works too and i think i saw the same in
hibernate (can't remember the name)

maybe just another "merge" project to create, wdyt?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>:
> +0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator is a
> constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.)
>
> @ thomas:
> besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1].
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional
>
>
>
> 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>
>> yep: here the extra part:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific
>> IIRC)
>>
>> and here the email:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/17 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>:
>> > +1 to Romain's thoughts.
>> >
>> > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since
>> > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application stack.
>> >  Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps it would
>> > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints in an
>> > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're just part of
>> > the JAR).
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we shouldnt take
>> >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for that) - i
>> >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra
>> >>
>> >> wdyt?
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>:
>> >> > ng i used in some project is
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message