deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle
Date Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:42:55 GMT
I honestly don't have a preference for the names.

+1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem <bleathem@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote:
>
>> can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]?
>>
>> @ListenerFor(phaseEventClass=.**..)
>>
>> or, if we need a unique name, perhaps:
>>
>> @ListenerForPhase(**phaseEventClass=...)
>>
>
> As Gerhard pointed out in IRC, this would just be a marker annotation, and
> hence empty:
> @ListenerForPhase()
>
> Brian
>
>


-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message