deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: XML Config
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:50:42 GMT
what does bring xml? i think that's the point

if it is only to get a format with hierarchy  you can use yaml for instance

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com*




2012/9/10 Bernard Łabno <s4237@pjwstk.edu.pl>

> If you find elegant way to do everything that can be currently done then
> it's cool not to use XML, but if we won't be able to i.e. configure bean
> properties between compilation and deployment then it will be great
> disappointment.
>
> 2012/9/10 Charles Moulliard <ch007m@gmail.com>
>
> > I would prefer that we avoid to use XML. Otherwise, end users will be
> > confused about what a CDI / CDI Extension should looks like and why we
> are
> > moving one step down to do what Spring / Xbean are doing.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Why i would like to use files (i find xml too verbose) is for constants
> > > (uri for instance) or alternative/interceptor (as mentionned)
> > >
> > > Today i find other use case the translation of bad design
> > >
> > > ...just my opinion maybe
> > > Le 7 sept. 2012 23:01, "Jason Porter" <lightguard.jp@gmail.com> a
> écrit
> > :
> > >
> > > > Mark, Pete and I discussed a little bit about the XML config (from
> > > Solder)
> > > > on IRC today. We quickly decided that we needed to move over to the
> > > mailing
> > > > list for more input, and to make things official.
> > > >
> > > > As things currently exist in the Solder XML Config, it's probably not
> > > > portable and would really need some of the changes in CDI 1.1 to work
> > > > properly. We also discussed throwing out the idea of completely
> > > configuring
> > > > beans via XML and using the XML config for other tasks such as
> applying
> > > > interceptors and the like via regex or similar ideas, in other words
> > > having
> > > > it being a subset of what currently exists today. What is in Solder
> is
> > > very
> > > > similar to configuring beans via XML in Spring, and we feel that
> > paradigm
> > > > has sailed.
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting this thread to get some other ideas about what we should
> > do
> > > > for XML config and also see what people think.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jason Porter
> > > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> > > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
> > > >
> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > Open Source Advocate
> > > > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
> > > >
> > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> > > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charles Moulliard
> > Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
> > Twitter : @cmoulliard
> > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message