Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC90AD419 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64670 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2012 03:40:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64430 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2012 03:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64357 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2012 03:40:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cody.lerum@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:40:34 +0000 Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57so572690eek.6 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPe+zXpN9W9GRkKSmRIO1xngtoriB85oP7UaRcxYDsc=; b=t9OgMoW7sulXivdGp9h6umQoKVMZR0XyWSf8co3Goxh8NOxiA5JdixNMtIgKop9+p5 ZJGzN9ZFOzt43PD30GJUIMP45uT3WFlFOpUsv/ad3swiyCdTzRbnIhp+ubwl6qUFi96t xvCOKntYFItbViRPqEv3lVCDlS3alXDG4pWJebsj/K1XsEdm+aTyuxByi9zgkr9tj8m+ YkaydMvEL1nPuXj4uEDgiys0DKx5I/hiyGC5RNgaV9M/F5T4Up1/svTEJf+rCbbNmfGY CZpQ6bxMhSnHWKPO6+ExUK/n/0R/k6Ktw9XR9IBTdogK7iaMkjmyD+8jSxxLtokkaz5L NprQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.219.198 with SMTP id m46mr9036328eep.18.1344742812920; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.202.4 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1344697293.42847.YahooMailNeo@web28904.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:40:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: @SuppressWarning(unchecked) and likes From: Cody Lerum To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +0 On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jason Porter wro= te: > +0 > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Herzog wr= ote: > >> +1 from me >> >> -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Arne Limburg [mailto:arne.limburg@openknowledge.de] >> Gesendet: Samstag, 11. August 2012 18:18 >> An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg >> Betreff: Re: @SuppressWarning(unchecked) and likes >> >> +1 from me, too >> >> >> Am 11.08.12 17:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter : >> >> >Hi! >> > >> >Is it really necessary to have this suppress annotation in all of our >> >sources? >> >This stuff is most times even IDE specific, and I honestly see no >> >reason for having it. >> > >> >If someone doesn't like the warnings in some IDEs, then just disable it >> >in your configuration. >> >But I see no reason for instead adding the suppression marker to each >> >and every class. >> > >> >I'm all for +1 to remove it. >> >wdyt? >> > >> >LieGrue, >> >strub >> >> > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > Software Engineer > Open Source Advocate > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu