deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: @SuppressWarning(unchecked) and likes
Date Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:40:12 GMT
+0

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com> wrote:
> +0
>
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Herzog <t.herzog@curecomp.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 from me
>>
>> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Arne Limburg [mailto:arne.limburg@openknowledge.de]
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 11. August 2012 18:18
>> An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg
>> Betreff: Re: @SuppressWarning(unchecked) and likes
>>
>> +1 from me, too
>>
>>
>> Am 11.08.12 17:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <struberg@yahoo.de>:
>>
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >Is it really necessary to have this suppress annotation in all of our
>> >sources?
>> >This stuff is most times even IDE specific, and I honestly see no
>> >reason for having it.
>> >
>> >If someone doesn't like the warnings in some IDEs, then just disable it
>> >in your configuration.
>> >But I see no reason for instead adding the suppression marker to each
>> >and every class.
>> >
>> >I'm all for +1 to remove it.
>> >wdyt?
>> >
>> >LieGrue,
>> >strub
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jason Porter
> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Mime
View raw message