Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lightguard.jp@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGJtJfHZMcG=CXowqJ91tj9QAJ=b7a39ksntoajeKYf6P-8etA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAN+FrnXAqGECFuxwkqo7+aeW3MOZGM+e51Q9-O9kjpfoDAB0Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1341210997.57365.YahooMailNeo@web171502.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
 <CAEXeC6wrKd+FTcy-+Aqpp97h5VA-dB=pHW02FE1stPV0FAEkmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEp_U4HonWT9zthO=cUDRcao9a7sV5BCeF0n67kVUy-bOaUxEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALd_DcOaiVW7=73i1ayj9cD8QeXoX1mtSNA-noW4bzK7Up4Tgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGJtJfHZMcG=CXowqJ91tj9QAJ=b7a39ksntoajeKYf6P-8etA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:44:02 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAF9TksPoX+O7o5=rHKm+4NcJ2476FZZnJQwTDJEz9OxQODwTvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Missing features for Seam 3 users adoption
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340991da5ab204c3f4a7f2

--14dae9340991da5ab204c3f4a7f2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

A very big +1 from me. I know we're all busy with things and this isn't our
first priority for most of us, but if all you can do is review
documentation or one section of code (say i18n or transaction from this
release) it will be much better than not doing anything. Also for any of
the previous Seam 3 contributors, the earlier you start looking at what
we're doing in DeltaSpike, the easier it will be for you to adapt your
module or create new ideas.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> wrote:

> hi @ all,
>
> since our plan is to get deltaspike in a good shape by v0.9, it's imo
> pretty obvious that we have to start with the jsf module soon (as well as
> with some other modules) and nobody questioned it so far.
> however, in view of planned features for release x nothing is a "must". we
> are a community centric open-source project and nothing else.
>
> since we communicate that until v1 even apis can change, we will see some
> early adaptors and people who start to experiment with it (which is great
> and important).
> however, imo most users will join after the api is stable. at least that's
> also what i hear on a regular basis - users are very interested in
> deltaspike, but they will (or have to) wait until it's stable.
>
> for now it's way more important to move on faster as a (dev-)community
> (independent of the topic).
> it's really very important to get more reviewers during the dev process.
> besides code-reviews also the documentation, examples,... are very
> important.
> we just can do it fast(er), if more people join the effort actively. right
> now we have about 4 (of more than 20) committers who join the effort on a
> regular basis.
> getting new contributors (and therefore potential committers) is important,
> but as a >short term< goal i would be happy to see more activity from
> existing committers.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2012/7/3 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <heidarzadeh2@gmail.com>
>
> > +1 for starting with JSF in 0.4
> >
> > I  think for 0.4, JSF is a must because most developers can start to use
> > Deltaspike since jsf is included in Deltaspike.
> >
> > --
> > Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani
> > Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer.
> > http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com
> >
>


-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

--14dae9340991da5ab204c3f4a7f2--