deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: security: why creating thg from scratch?
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:05 GMT
+1 for a vote about the IDM part, but imo we need a clear majority to
continue or drop with it.
if we don't have a clear majority, we should discuss it again in detail
(independent of the result).

regards,
gerhard



2012/7/26 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>

> so it really seems a vote is needed no?
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/7/26 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
>
> > I had suggested that awhile ago, but I don't think there was consensus.
> Or
> > maybe I just thought about it :) been awhile.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:22, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > hmm, not sure it answers the question. Shiro is an (fine IMO) API, DS
> > could
> > > use it as base instead of creating a new one in the Apache ecosystem.
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/7/26 Anil Saldhana <anilsaldhana@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> If Deltaspike desires to provide integration with shiro, make it as an
> > >> independent sub module of security. Similar to the independence of the
> > IDM
> > >> component. Security is too large to reside as a single module.
> > >>
> > >> On Jul 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> - Romain
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2012/7/25 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > >>>
> > >>>> hi @ all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> if there are objections, we have to finish the discussion before
we
> > >>>> continue with it or we start a vote about it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> regards,
> > >>>> gerhard
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2012/7/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, fully agree.
> > >>>>> I don't see any good reason to create a new framework.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Shiro, which is also in Apache is really great.
> > >>>>> They seem really interested in integrating CDI and they plan
to do
> > so.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> There is some interesting posts.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/CDI-and-WSS4J-integration-tp7577503.html
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/Security-in-DeltaSpike-tp7577514.html
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2012/7/12 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <heidarzadeh2@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Rather than marry into one security framework (Shiro),
>  Deltaspike
> > >>>>> should
> > >>>>>>> enable all security frameworks to provide integration.
That
> > includes
> > >> a
> > >>>>> DS
> > >>>>>>> integration from Shiro.
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Agree. If DS can provide a layer to support different
existing
> > >>>> security
> > >>>>>>> frameworks (Shiro, Spring Security, ...) with perhaps
JAAS
> modules
> > >>>>> (LDAP,
> > >>>>>>> JDBC, PropertiesFile, EncryptedPropertiesFile, ...)
top of CDI,
> > that
> > >>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>> be fine
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> With a good provided security integration api in DS, anyone
> > interested
> > >>>> in
> > >>>>>> any of those security frameworks will be able to use DS
and that
> > >> sounds
> > >>>>>> very nice and elegant.
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani
> > >>>>>> Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer.
> > >>>>>> http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message