deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: v0.4-incubating adding Seam Config (xml config)
Date Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:33:20 GMT
just an idea not directly linked: could be nice to force an object
configurable through XML to be declared as this (@Configurable)

- Romain


2012/7/7 Anil Saldhana <anilsaldhana@gmail.com>

> A XML based configuration for an object structure IMO is important when
> you do not want to add anything to the source of the object structure.
>
> This is the spring core dependency injection model that users may want
> from Deltaspike.
>
> I will definitely use it.
>
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Hmm just another idea:
> >
> > If we do an own config module, we could provide the core + different
> bindings:
> >
> > 1. the 'old' CDI spec XML config
> > 2. a Spring style XML config
> >
> > 3. ...
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Friday, July 6, 2012 10:14 PM
> >> Subject: Re: v0.4-incubating adding Seam Config (xml config)
> >>
> >> +0 since i'm not sure XML is really CDI spirit...and it needs to be
> >> consistent with already existing config (global alternatives etc) which
> can
> >> be a bit complicated
> >>
> >> - Romain
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/7/6 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> i'm not sure if we should start with it for v0.4, however, if it gets
> >> an
> >>> own (optional) module: +0
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> gerhard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/7/6 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> It's been a 10 on our list for awhile but we haven't done it
> >> yet.
> >>> Thoughts
> >>>> on adding it to v0.4? It would be a straight port from what we have
in
> >>> Seam
> >>>> 3 with package name changes. It's currently the only
> >> implementation in
> >>>> existence (that we know of) of the older xml config that was to be
> >> part
> >>> of
> >>>> spec but was later pulled.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jason Porter
> >>>> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> >>>> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
> >>>>
> >>>> Software Engineer
> >>>> Open Source Advocate
> >>>> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
> >>>>
> >>>> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> >>>> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message