deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marius Bogoevici <mbogo...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: [seam-dev] Sandbox for DeltaSpike
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:09:11 GMT
+1

We have taught ourselves to write self-explanatory code, and that is starting to show ;)

Sent from my iPhone

On 2012-06-29, at 3:22 PM, "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see nothing wrong with a sandbox, particularly since I think sometimes seeing code
is a better way to make spark discussion than trying to discuss everything up front. In order
to facilitate contribution and individual communication styles, and to promote more contributions
in general, I think this is a good step.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoevici@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think it is a good idea. Discussions can and should take place, but
> IMO an opend sandbox would be a good place to stage code for new
> features without endangering the stability of the whole project.
> 
> 
> On 12-06-26 3:39 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
> > Hey everyone!
> >
> > I wanted to bring up the idea of having a sandbox to add bits and other
> > non-core extensions. We have a great bunch of people from the
> > Seam development group looking to add their extensions, but they're either
> > not on the roadmap for DS, or are very far down. I suggest we setup a
> > sandbox on github people can write to, or at least do pull requests to so
> > we can get some of these modules and other ideas in and pull them into core
> > as we get there. We can also use this as a vetting ground for new ideas and
> > other things which may not exactly fit into core, like the forge extension.
> >
> > To do this we need to
> >
> > 1. Setup the repo somewhere
> > 2. Seed it with a basic structure (pom.xml, contribution instructions, etc)
> > 3. Get some CI setup somewhere (we could leverage OpenShift for this if
> > needed)
> >
> > What does everyone else think? I've cc'd the Seam Development list here
> > hoping to get some feedback from them as well and hopefully rekindle some
> > of the fire we had there.
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message