Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93FC39CAD for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58145 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 21:51:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltaspike-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58091 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 21:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58083 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2012 21:51:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:51:03 +0000 Received: by ghbf19 with SMTP id f19so2595453ghb.6 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:50:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=qiPLZej6uSFLmlOBPLH/9+O8NKXYrb38FZkfsMsB1Tw=; b=smn6zq0fiKLQWvBopna9IVcy0UEM5O8pJhD3UZ3VB6d/R3ShRhxdiDrX+ja0MLTxo0 ZE8aoiGPDkkG707O5PnbZBneC7LzINysaNSxcjWWrjVSGD4zuGvT6f6FI9MlqZpgPCFv BfMtf/ay7ASreOcI65MGjYlsSInC4UwXVzong= Received: by 10.101.145.19 with SMTP id x19mr7172774ann.80.1329169842381; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:50:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.61.65 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:50:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1329168592.35745.YahooMailNeo@web171517.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1329168592.35745.YahooMailNeo@web171517.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> From: Gerhard Petracek Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: release branches To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d3e2244d222f04b8df786c --0016e6d3e2244d222f04b8df786c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 regards, gerhard 2012/2/13 Mark Struberg > I'd say we just push the release-branch + the release-tag and then merge > them over to master. This is only needed to upgrade the versions. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >________________________________ > > From: Gerhard Petracek > >To: deltaspike > >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:49 PM > >Subject: release branches > > > >hi @ all, > > > >since a new commit was pushed before we merged back the release branch, we > >have to discuss release branches right now. > > > >the options i see right now are: > >1) we push the external named release-branch as it is (+ tag) and rebase > >the master > >2) we merge the external release branch locally and just push the result > >as i did with the master at [1] > >3) we don't allow pushes (in the future) before we pushed the fast > >forwarded master. > > > >regards, > >gerhard > > > >[1] https://github.com/os890/DS_Discuss > > > > > > > --0016e6d3e2244d222f04b8df786c--