deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: reverted commit
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:09:23 GMT
Wait, I don't think is where we landed!  :)  Per Sam "under the terms
of the ALv2" is *not* the kind of license/grant we want, and he is
happy to let deltaspike go on committing things for which everyone
*expects* the appropriate SG will be eventually filed.

Matt

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Gerhard Petracek
<gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi @ all,
>
> i had to revert 1177d4a7fd3e669eb84ce3987368d5ceaebfeb6a because shane
> didn't add
>  "Submitted on behalf of a third-part: Red Hat, Inc. under the terms of the
> ALv2"
> to the commit message of the initial import.
>
> furthermore there were
>  - no license headers
>  - 81 checkstyle issues
> i fixed those issues and pushed them to [1] - so you don't have to do it
> again.
>
> @shane:
> please import the files again and don't forget the hint in the commit
> message.
>
> @all:
> please always run
>  mvn clean install
> before a push.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] https://github.com/os890/DS_Discuss/tree/DS69fixed

Mime
View raw message