deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Bryzak <sbry...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: reverted commit
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:12:41 GMT
There'll be no PicketLink integration in DeltaSpike Security.

On 23/02/12 02:25, Jason Porter wrote:
> This is simply a stop gap until all the issues with the software grant are worked out.
Richard has the files from Solder for the grant. Since I don't think it's been finalized should
we now also include Security? I wonder if that will be tricky as Security is so tightly coupled
with PicketLink.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 22, 2012, at 9:09, Matt Benson<gudnabrsam@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Wait, I don't think is where we landed!  :)  Per Sam "under the terms
>> of the ALv2" is *not* the kind of license/grant we want, and he is
>> happy to let deltaspike go on committing things for which everyone
>> *expects* the appropriate SG will be eventually filed.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Gerhard Petracek
>> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> hi @ all,
>>>
>>> i had to revert 1177d4a7fd3e669eb84ce3987368d5ceaebfeb6a because shane
>>> didn't add
>>>   "Submitted on behalf of a third-part: Red Hat, Inc. under the terms of the
>>> ALv2"
>>> to the commit message of the initial import.
>>>
>>> furthermore there were
>>>   - no license headers
>>>   - 81 checkstyle issues
>>> i fixed those issues and pushed them to [1] - so you don't have to do it
>>> again.
>>>
>>> @shane:
>>> please import the files again and don't forget the hint in the commit
>>> message.
>>>
>>> @all:
>>> please always run
>>>   mvn clean install
>>> before a push.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> gerhard
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/os890/DS_Discuss/tree/DS69fixed


Mime
View raw message