Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEXeC6xCASmK5s6DRtBcxLyRFmAqdgWqUSL0sbgBes0HOEf81A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGJtJfH7DBFYxrABOs5DyLdrUOuA8ugwjROX3fvhk7D7Rc_jwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <BB2E3F81-8E11-4256-B96B-49C94576CE7C@redhat.com>
 <0DFD8942-A8A1-49EE-9143-1E1E17B4E65E@gmail.com>
 <CAEXeC6xCASmK5s6DRtBcxLyRFmAqdgWqUSL0sbgBes0HOEf81A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:17:21 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGJtJfHfjc5NviqTTUg-CqX0NnTn14RhozPxxfCa7-BzSauHhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-53] annotation literals for std. cdi
 annotations
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi @ all,

if there are no objections i'll push it by the end of the day. jason
thought about creating (jira-)sub-tasks for every literal.
since the implementation itself isn't in question, i'll push the
commit as it is and if we think that we don't need one of the literals
we can remove it again.

regards,
gerhard


2012/1/19 Christian Kaltepoth <christian@kaltepoth.de>:
> +1
>
> 2012/1/18 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>:
>> +1 for the annotation literals. IMO, the spec should have literals for all the annotations it defines.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:49, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 18 Jan 2012, at 16:47, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi @ all,
>>>>
>>>> while reviewing DELTASPIKE-45 i saw that some literal implementations for
>>>> std. cdi annotations got into deltaspike as well.
>>>> in myfaces codi we also have some literal implementations. esp. for
>>>> DELTASPIKE-45 they make a lot of sense imo.
>>>> -> i created DELTASPIKE-53 and since there is just one std. way to
>>>> implement them, i pushed a preview to [1].
>>>>
>>>> if we agree that those literal implementations for std. cdi annotations
>>>> should be included, i'll push the missing implementations.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> gerhard
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/ja
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal