Mailing-List: contact deltaspike-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pmuir@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] modules and basic tasks for deltaspike v0.2
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F25EBF7.9010502@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:46:36 +0000
Cc: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <05F061A0-09AB-4BF0-9E1B-276F9A6CA3B2@redhat.com>
References: 
 <CAGJtJfF1F-YiJVvj5A-nEa8yo+W3e5KGTo+36jQhd6V62-NTmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F25EBF7.9010502@redhat.com>
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org


On 30 Jan 2012, at 01:01, Shane Bryzak wrote:

> On 27/01/12 16:55, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>> hi @ all,
>>=20
>> (i planned to send this mail after starting the release procedure for =
v0.1.
>> however, the review phase for v0.1 is going to end soon and we have =
seen
>> several other discussions already.)
>>=20
>> imo with v0.2 we should start working on multiple modules in =
parallel.
>>=20
>> e.g.:
>>  - security (that's also one of the few parts of myfaces codi-core we
>> haven't discussed so far)
>=20
> I'd like to open a discussion on the security requirements in the next =
few days, both myself and Bolek Dawidowicz (another Red Hat employee who =
wrote the PicketLink IDM module) plan to develop a new CDI-based =
security solution based on Seam Security and PicketLink IDM, and I think =
the DeltaSpike umbrella would be the perfect place to do this.  We are =
just waiting to get internal clearance on this before we can proceed, =
which should hopefully happen by the middle of this week.
>=20

Note that "based on Seam Security and PicketLink IDM" does not mean =
"using PicketLink IDM and Seam Security as libs" but rather "inspired by =
previous work on =85" :-)

I know that Dan has been looking at Shiro, and that CODI has some good =
security extensions, so I think we could be well placed!

>>  - jpa
>>  - (core - further features, refactorings, ...)
>>=20
>> imo: since we agreed on "release early and often", it should be =
enough for
>> the next ~6 weeks.
>>=20
>> furthermore, we can check the legal aspects concerning the upcoming
>> donations before starting technical discussions about those
>> modules/features (e.g. the spring-cdi integration module).
>>=20
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>=20
>=20