deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Project Planning
Date Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:08:47 GMT
hi mark,

you are right - however, that's also only a basic agreement
(see NarrowingBeanBuilder and AnnotatedTypeBuilder)

regards,
gerhard



2012/1/2 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> Nope, we have AnnotatedTypeBuilder. This is really a big must
>
> + we have the test structure.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> PS: no worries Jason, family always comes first!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 1:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: Project Planning
> >
> > hi jason,
> >
> > thx for the info.
> > (i'm sorry to hear that.)
> >
> > @your upcoming commits:
> >
> > it would be nice if you can provide the infrastructure for in-container
> > arquillian tests.
> >
> > currently we don't have a single solder feature we agreed on.
> > basically we agreed on @Veto in general, but we haven't agreed on the
> name
> > and therefore we need a formal vote.
> > i'm not sure whether or not we should postpone the vote for some days
> > (until more community members are back).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/1/2 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
> >
> >>  I'll get on the commit wagon shortly. With the Red Hat company shut
> > down
> >>  last week, coupled with my wife's emergency trip to see her father
> > before
> >>  he passes I've been busy with three of our kids. I'm hoping to
> > commit some
> >>  tomorrow, Tuesday for sure when my wife is back and I'm not playing Mom
> > and
> >>  Dad :)
> >>
> >>  Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>  On Jan 1, 2012, at 17:10, "John D. Ament"
> > <john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  > So (and this is going to sound extremely cliche)
> >>  > What can I do to help?
> >>  > Cuz right now I see lots of commits from you and strub, Lots of
> >>  discusses.
> >>  >
> >>  > John
> >>  >
> >>  > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> >>  gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> >>  >> wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  >> hi john,
> >>  >>
> >>  >> jason did that already for solder.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> in general:
> >>  >> we added all parts to [1] and created tasks [2] to discuss them on
> > the
> >>  >> mailing list (see the "[DISCUSS] ..." mails).
> >>  >> we started to discuss the features with the highest ranking. as
> > soon as
> >>  we
> >>  >> agree on a feature, we create a "feature"-ticket (e.g.
> > [3]) and it gets
> >>  >> committed to deltaspike.
> >>  >> afterwards we continue with the next feature/s
> >>  >>
> >>  >> regards,
> >>  >> gerhard
> >>  >>
> >>  >> [1]
> >>  >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking
> >>  >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-2
> >>  >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-21
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >> 2012/1/2 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>> Hi All
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Was wondering, since I'm new at this and completely lost,
> > how do we go
> >>  >>> about putting features into deltaspike?  Let's say I love
> > something in
> >>  >>> Solder and figure that would be great for deltaspike, do I
> > just create
> >>  a
> >>  >>> JIRA, email the group saying I want XXXX and here's why?
> > Maybe I
> >>  missed
> >>  >> an
> >>  >>> on boarding seminar somewhere .. :-)
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Thanks,
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> John
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message