deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:24:10 GMT
+1!

regards,
gerhard



2012/1/25 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> >>  -1 to i18n and typesafe logging for version one.
> >>
> >
> > Lincoln, why you hatin' on type-safe logging? Brother, hook me up with a
> +1
> > :)
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
> Hehe, that's the nice thing here at Apache.
> Since we only discuss those things on strictly technical levels we are
> still all brothers, even if we get some -1 sometimes :)
>
> Don't worry Dan, if there are diverse opinions, then we have passed the
> test for the first lesson: free thinking :)
>
> Having some +1 and -1 in an early discussion phase only means one thing:
> we need more arguments.
>
> Lincoln, most of the times (at least if you see that a few people already
> casted +1 for some idea) it's very helpful if you underline your -1 with
> technical arguments means "_why_ you don't like type-safe logging" and/or
> the requirements you would have for such a feature to be successful.
>
> Most votes here are majority votes [1], but I've seen it many times that
> (even after there are already lots of +1 on the table) a single person
> outlined a problem and did cast -1. And if the argument is valid, it's
> pretty often the case that the others recall their +1 and change it to -1
> as well.
>
> It's really all about the arguments.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message