deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] merging of features (@Veto, @ProjectStageActivated and @ExpressionActivated)
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:22:00 GMT
+1

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:09, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is very readable. +1
> On Jan 3, 2012 4:52 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > as discussed with mark we could think about details like inProjectStage
> vs
> > ifProjectStage, however, basically +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/1/3 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >
> > > hi @ all,
> > >
> > > we came up with a new idea to merge @Veto, @ProjectStageActivated and
> > > @ExpressionActivated.
> > > arne combined [1] some of the previous suggestions and the result would
> > > solve the @Veto naming discussion as well.
> > >
> > > if we merge those features, we would get something like:
> > > @Exclude
> > > @Exclude(inProjectStage=Production.class)
> > > @Exclude(notInProjectStage=UnitTest.class)
> > > @Exclude(onExpression="myProperty==myValue")
> > > @Exclude(onExpression="[my custom expression syntax]",
> > > interpretedBy=CustomExpressionInterpreter.class)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/6rbzbrtzye3y65lu
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message