deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Project Planning
Date Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:28:28 GMT
We could just add AnnotatedTypeBuilder and then refactor it if needed based on the vote outcome.


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 1, 2012, at 18:08, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi mark,
> 
> you are right - however, that's also only a basic agreement
> (see NarrowingBeanBuilder and AnnotatedTypeBuilder)
> 
> regards,
> gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> 2012/1/2 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> 
>> Nope, we have AnnotatedTypeBuilder. This is really a big must
>> 
>> + we have the test structure.
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> PS: no worries Jason, family always comes first!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 1:42 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Project Planning
>>> 
>>> hi jason,
>>> 
>>> thx for the info.
>>> (i'm sorry to hear that.)
>>> 
>>> @your upcoming commits:
>>> 
>>> it would be nice if you can provide the infrastructure for in-container
>>> arquillian tests.
>>> 
>>> currently we don't have a single solder feature we agreed on.
>>> basically we agreed on @Veto in general, but we haven't agreed on the
>> name
>>> and therefore we need a formal vote.
>>> i'm not sure whether or not we should postpone the vote for some days
>>> (until more community members are back).
>>> 
>>> regards,
>>> gerhard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2012/1/2 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>
>>> 
>>>> I'll get on the commit wagon shortly. With the Red Hat company shut
>>> down
>>>> last week, coupled with my wife's emergency trip to see her father
>>> before
>>>> he passes I've been busy with three of our kids. I'm hoping to
>>> commit some
>>>> tomorrow, Tuesday for sure when my wife is back and I'm not playing Mom
>>> and
>>>> Dad :)
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 1, 2012, at 17:10, "John D. Ament"
>>> <john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> So (and this is going to sound extremely cliche)
>>>>> What can I do to help?
>>>>> Cuz right now I see lots of commits from you and strub, Lots of
>>>> discusses.
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> hi john,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> jason did that already for solder.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> in general:
>>>>>> we added all parts to [1] and created tasks [2] to discuss them on
>>> the
>>>>>> mailing list (see the "[DISCUSS] ..." mails).
>>>>>> we started to discuss the features with the highest ranking. as
>>> soon as
>>>> we
>>>>>> agree on a feature, we create a "feature"-ticket (e.g.
>>> [3]) and it gets
>>>>>> committed to deltaspike.
>>>>>> afterwards we continue with the next feature/s
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-2
>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-21
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2012/1/2 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Was wondering, since I'm new at this and completely lost,
>>> how do we go
>>>>>>> about putting features into deltaspike?  Let's say I love
>>> something in
>>>>>>> Solder and figure that would be great for deltaspike, do I
>>> just create
>>>> a
>>>>>>> JIRA, email the group saying I want XXXX and here's why?
>>> Maybe I
>>>> missed
>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> on boarding seminar somewhere .. :-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message