deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: suggested git workflow/s
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:25:09 GMT
No, au contraire - each committer _must_ push himself if possible!

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:42 AM
> Subject: Re: suggested git workflow/s
> 
> As long as it is not required that we have specific named branches and
> someone else has to push in code, I'm ok with the proposed git flow in the
> wiki.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jason Porter 
> <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>>  Shall we start those discussions now? Might as well.
>> 
>>  On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:00, Gerhard Petracek
>>  <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>  > hi @ all,
>>  >
>>  > mark added some additional suggestions to the wiki [1].
>>  >
>>  > besides that we have to discuss further topics like:
>>  >  - file encoding
>>  >  - line-endings
>>  >  - usage of special characters
>>  >
>>  > regards,
>>  > gerhard
>>  >
>>  > [1]
>>  >
>>  >
>> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Suggested+Git+Workflows
>>  >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  Jason Porter
>>  http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>>  http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>> 
>>  Software Engineer
>>  Open Source Advocate
>>  Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
>> 
>>  PGP key id: 926CCFF5
>>  PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message