deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-53] annotation literals for std. cdi annotations
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:01 GMT
+1 for the annotation literals. IMO, the spec should have literals for all the annotations
it defines. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:49, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:

> +1
> 
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 16:47, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> 
>> hi @ all,
>> 
>> while reviewing DELTASPIKE-45 i saw that some literal implementations for
>> std. cdi annotations got into deltaspike as well.
>> in myfaces codi we also have some literal implementations. esp. for
>> DELTASPIKE-45 they make a lot of sense imo.
>> -> i created DELTASPIKE-53 and since there is just one std. way to
>> implement them, i pushed a preview to [1].
>> 
>> if we agree that those literal implementations for std. cdi annotations
>> should be included, i'll push the missing implementations.
>> 
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>> 
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/ja
> 

Mime
View raw message