deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-5] Deactivatable
Date Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:18:45 GMT
hi @ all,

it looks like we have an agreement. i'm going to create the corresponding
jira issues.
(imo: since we haven't seen objections btw. a discussion about it and it
isn't a formal vote, we can start right now.)

regards,
gerhard



2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoevici@gmail.com>

> +1
>
> On 2011-12-19, at 2:49 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > fyi: please check [1] before you answer.
> >
> > [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage.
> >
> > the basic concept:
> > pre-configured cdi artifacts (like implementations of
> > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension) which can't be deactivated via
> > ProcessAnnotatedType#veto are deactivatable via implementations of
> > ClassDeactivator.
> >
> > please send
> > +1, +0 or -1 because...
> > for the basic idea as well as the basic concept.
> > if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [3]
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Config+and+SPI#CoreConfigandSPI-Deactivatingdefaultimplementations
> > [3]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message