deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
Date Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:40:08 GMT
the easiest way in this case is a formal vote about @Veto vs @Exclude vs
@Unmanaged/@NotManaged

regards,
gerhard



2011/12/30 Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com>

> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici
> <marius.bogoevici@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >  I suggested @Unmanaged (or even @NotManaged, or anything that refers to
> > "class as a managed bean" in the spirit of 3.1.1). Overall, I think that
> > @Unmanaged is a better fit, for the reasons I explained previously. I
> think
> > that renaming is not such a big issue, in the light of a DeltaSpike
> > migration.
> >
>
> I agree. The best suggestion yet, esp since we seem to be at an impasse
> between @Veto and @Exclude.
>
> I think that @NotManaged reads better than @Unmanaged, but I would be happy
> with either one.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message