deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Sabot-Durand <>
Subject Re: suggested procedure for feature discussions
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:33:35 GMT
I added a comment on [1] regarding Generic Beans. Just repeat here that it makes me nervous
to see those with no ranking in the list since I did a lot of refactoring in Social to use
them. They help clearing my code.


Le 14 déc. 2011 à 20:21, Gerhard Petracek a écrit :

> hi @ all,
> at [1] we started to rank the importance of the available features we are
> going to discuss (currently just for myfaces codi-core and seam-solder).
> with the ranking we just get the order for our discussions. a low rank
> doesn't mean that the feature won't be included.
> if a feature gets included depends on the corresponding discussions.
> i created jira tickets [2] for all top-level features (ranked with 10).
> i'll start individual threads for jira-issue #3 - #7.
> for every issue i'll provide a link of a wiki page which describes the
> basic idea as well as the >usage<. and the mail will contain a summary
> which provides e.g. the suggested api (there might be small differences
> compared to the existing implementation).
> for all features which are marked with 'y' at ' "Requires" concept
> changes', i'll provide the new suggestion.
> please review the provided information of a feature under discussion before
> you answer. you can add >basic< objections to [1].
> i suggest that we just discuss very basic topics in this first step. we can
> discuss details e.g. further objections about the concrete implementation
> (e.g. internal classes,...) as soon as we agreed on including the feature.
> @jason:
> it would be nice if you start threads for jira-issue #8 - #10
> regards,
> gerhard
> [1]
> [2]

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message