Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-deltacloud-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-deltacloud-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57B1F16C for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86238 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 00:16:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-deltacloud-dev-archive@deltacloud.apache.org Received: (qmail 86186 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 00:16:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@deltacloud.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@deltacloud.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@deltacloud.apache.org Received: (qmail 86118 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2013 00:16:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:16:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [116.50.57.190] (HELO cluster-k.mailcontrol.com) (116.50.57.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:16:11 +0000 Received: from mail2.fujitsu.com.au (mail2.fujitsu.com.au [216.14.192.226]) by rly03k.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id r3O0FecU000873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:15:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.fujitsu.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838B62F5095 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:40 +1000 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.fujitsu.com.au Received: from mail2.fujitsu.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.fujitsu.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id j4NzjBPeTNok for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:40 +1000 (EST) Received: from SYD0633.au.fujitsu.com (unknown [137.172.78.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail2.fujitsu.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C5D2F5092 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:40 +1000 (EST) Received: from mailfilter1.au.fjanz.com (137.172.19.78) by SYD0633.au.fujitsu.com (137.172.78.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:37 +1000 Received: from RadwareLoad Balancer (137.172.78.70) [137.172.78.70] by mailfilter1.au.fjanz.com - Websense Email Security (7.0.0); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:39 +1000 Received: from FALEX03.au.fjanz.com ([137.172.72.103]) by SYD0630.au.fjanz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:31 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: shouldn't contraint's values be inlined? Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:29 +1000 Message-ID: <434A0ECB689CAF49A3A2321F30F2AB8325E85A94@FALEX03.au.fjanz.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: shouldn't contraint's values be inlined? Thread-Index: Ac5Af5XQZ9fAU86xR6+wlHBfRUkGvA== From: "Koper, Dies" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2013 00:15:31.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4F10580:01CE4080] X-SEF-Processed: 7_0_0_00239__2013_04_24_10_15_40 X-Scanned-By: MailControl 14771.152 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.75.0.113 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Frederic asked me about resource metadata: Is the XML serialization of attribute constraints correct ? UZXC0GRT-ZG8ZJCJ07 Should it just be UZXC0GRT-ZG8ZJCJ07 ? He also pointed me to http://mantis.dmtf.org/mantis/view.php?id=3D1971. Is this what the proposal envisioned? mantis1971_v2.odt has "value constraints" in italics - not sure what to make of that. Regards, Dies Koper