deltacloud-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Lutterkort <lut...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: storage_volumes and cimi volumes include system volumes?
Date Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:58:31 GMT
Hi Dies,

are these truly volumes (i.e., storage that as its own lifecycle, not
connected to that of the machine to which it is attached ?) If so, I
believe they should be included - if they vanish when the machine
vanishes, they are 'disks' not 'volumes' in CIMI lingo.

David

On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 09:38 +1100, Koper, Dies wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Should/may storage_volumes include system volumes (i.e. the "boot
> drive")?
> How about for the cimi volumes collection?
> 
> For fgcp I am currently including system volumes in storage_volumes
> (which with the current mapping includes them in cimi volumes).
> I set the :kind attribute (aligned with rhevm) to 'system' for these
> volumes.
> They're attached to instances and can't be deattached.
> 
> The reason I wanted them in storage_volumes at the time was because it
> allowed me to map system volume snapshot (i.e. instance backup &
> restore).
> 
> But when I was looking at the system_volumes collection and saw all the
> system volumes in there I started wondering...
> 
> Regards,
> Dies Koper
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message