Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-deltacloud-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltacloud-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 162157D6A for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98009 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2011 13:34:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltacloud-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97991 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2011 13:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact deltacloud-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97983 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2011 13:34:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:34:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clalance@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:34:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8EDXjjG016272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:33:45 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp-100-19-47.bos.redhat.com [10.16.19.47]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8EDO7XS025792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:24:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:24:07 -0400 From: Chris Lalancette To: deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH core] Correct service status reporting in Fedora Message-ID: <20110914132406.GE2674@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Chris Lalancette References: <1315979422-13691-1-git-send-email-rwsu@redhat.com> <3A8FB79F-2069-47F0-A96F-B4D91FAC7CC6@redhat.com> <82FD9A1F-6F9D-4EDE-BFF5-BA64A930C184@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82FD9A1F-6F9D-4EDE-BFF5-BA64A930C184@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 On 09/14/11 - 12:06:10PM, Francesco Vollero wrote: > But as i just saw this patch modify the patch of clalance. So how to do it?? I just pushed my patches, so I'll rebase this one on top of mine and then push it. -- Chris Lalancette