Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11690 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 09:22:02 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 09:22:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24978 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2004 09:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 24739 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2004 09:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Users List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 24715 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 09:21:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwei.siemens.at) (193.81.246.12) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 09:21:46 -0000 Received: from bavc001a.bav.siemens.ro (pix6-pri.frust.net [193.81.246.198] (may be forged)) by zwei.siemens.at (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2P9LiK0015621 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:21:45 +0100 Received: from RO1CV02D ([163.242.239.126]) by bavc001a.bav.siemens.ro with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id HS9RJV0F; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:21:13 +0200 From: "Alexandru Dovlecel" To: "'Apache Torque Users List'" Subject: RE: torque delete Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:21:40 +0200 Message-ID: <000e01c4124a$95709600$7eeff2a3@ro1cv02d> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <4062A284.6050109@sipeinformatica.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If you refer to the mail I have just sent, then: The questions I have asked are generic. Not a specific implementation. The table I want to delete entries from has no primary key and was created to normalise a Many To Many relation. The question: is it recommended to use criteria to delete entries in this table, or works faster if passing objects to the delete method? Is there any performance drawback for those approaches? alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Sipe Informatica [mailto:desarrollo@sipeinformatica.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:13 AM > To: Apache Torque Users List > Subject: Re: torque delete > > > Wich database are you using? Wich method for primarykeys have > you set? > idbroker or native? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org