db-torque-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <mccallis...@forthillcompany.com>
Subject Re: Hibernate vs. Torque
Date Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:17:06 GMT

On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 02:05 PM, Mitch Christensen wrote:

> Why haven't I heard any references to The Castor Project &
> JDO(http://castor.exolab.org/)?  It seems to me that if O/R mapping is 
> the
> goal, castor should be considered a strong candidate.  Castor also 
> provides
> O/XML mapping as well.
>

1) Castor is far less performant (order of magnitude in most tests I 
have seen or performed) than Torque, OJB, or Hibernate.
2) Castor JDO is not JDO compliant, which just annoys people because 
the name pretty much implies they are.

> Is there something that Torque provides that castor doesn't?  
> Simplicity
> perhaps?
>
> -Mitch


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message